Lemmy's gaining popularity, so I thought new people should see this.

submitted by Samuel Block

cross-posted from: https://feddit.nl/post/16246531

I feel like we need to talk about Lemmy's massive tankie censorship problem. A lot of popular lemmy communities are hosted on lemmy.ml. It's been well known for a while that the admins/mods of that instance have, let's say, rather extremist and onesided political views. In short, they're what's colloquially referred to as tankies. This wouldn't be much of an issue if they didn't regularly abuse their admin/mod status to censor and silence people who dissent with their political beliefs and for example, post things critical of China, Russia, the USSR, socialism, ...

As an example, there was a thread today about the anniversary of the Tiananmen Massacre. When I was reading it, there were mostly posts critical of China in the thread and some whataboutist/denialist replies critical of the USA and the west. In terms of votes, the posts critical of China were definitely getting the most support.

I posted a comment in this thread linking to "https://archive.ph/2020.07.12-074312/https://imgur.com/a/AIIbbPs" (WARNING: graphical content), which describes aspects of the atrocities that aren't widely known even in the West, and supporting evidence. My comment was promptly removed for violating the "Be nice and civil" rule. When I looked back at the thread, I noticed that all posts critical of China had been removed while the whataboutist and denialist comments were left in place.

This is what the modlog of the instance looks like:

Definitely a trend there wouldn't you say?

When I called them out on their one sided censorship, with a screenshot of the modlog above, I promptly received a community ban on all communities on lemmy.ml that I had ever participated in.

Proof:

So many of you will now probably think something like: "So what, it's the fediverse, you can use another instance."

The problem with this reasoning is that many of the popular communities are actually on lemmy.ml, and they're not so easy to replace. I mean, in terms of content and engagement lemmy is already a pretty small place as it is. So it's rather pointless sitting for example in /c/linux@some.random.other.instance.world where there's nobody to discuss anything with.

I'm not sure if there's a solution here, but I'd like to urge people to avoid lemmy.ml hosted communities in favor of communities on more reasonable instances.

Log in to comment

346 Comments

db0 , edited

When I called them out on their one sided censorship, with a screenshot of the modlog above, I promptly received a community ban on all communities on lemmy.ml that I had ever participated in.

Note, that just means you were sitebanned. This is how the software displays this.

Also !yepowertrippinbastards@lemmy.dbzer0.com

sunzu2 , edited

Why doesn't this one open on my mbin instance?

db0

🤷

fuckingkangaroos

I wonder how many good, reasonable people have checked out Lemmy and seen all the CCP/Kremlin propaganda then just left.

SorteKanin

I mean, lead them to instances that defederate hexbear for starters? Seems reasonable anyway.

FarraigePlaisteach

I don’t tell anyone I use this site in case they come across that stuff first. I just say I use a site “similar to Reddit”. I’m surprised that they don’t ask me the name but most of my friends don’t spend so much time online.

fuckingkangaroos

Same, I haven't told a soul I use it despite being active here over a year. I still believe in it though (or just really hate the idea of accepting corporate social media).

OpenStars

Personally I am sitting at 100% of the people who I mention Lemmy to irl doing so. Not only that, but they actually gave me dirty looks and admonished me for even so much as mentioning it. It is easy for us who have blocked such to forget but... the day-1 experience for someone new can be *quite shocking*. e.g. just search for the word "guillotine", preferably from an instance you are not logged into, to see all the calls for literal and actual (and not joking... not *really*) murder of people who participate in such wildly anti-communist practices as ... <checks notes> "have bank accounts".

Though maybe X is just as bad these days? I dunno, I never had an account even when it was Twitter:-D. In any case, it is grandfathered into the public consciousness, and the devil you know... you know? :-P

fuckingkangaroos

Yeah, I imagined basically exactly that happening and decided not to tell anyone about it, not yet anyway. Also, I don't want them to get death threats from Hexbear like I did...

OpenStars

Yeesh, I am so sorry that happened to you - tankies are just *the worst*, aren't they? You could literally put a URL to those exact conversations and they would still come back with "well no, see, we aren't that way at all bc... shut up!" They *enjoy* all the drama that they stir up - it's *the point* (go read the actual sidebar text of Chapotraphouse and the_dunk_tank and their posts e.g. talking about defederating with the rest of Lemmy, except no they actually don't want to do that for the simple reason that it provides moar people "to dunk on" - let me know if you want the receipt for that statement and I'll dig it up).

It is somehow worse than talking to Trump supporters, bc at least those believe in something, as opposed to existing solely for the purpose of "the dunk".

And then it's so sad that the rest of Lemmy tolerates it. Not the communism mind you, I'm talking about the dunking and other harassment.

Well, we learn at least, not to mention Lemmy to people irl. It's so sad that it must be that way... it *severely* limits our growth, but it is what it is.:-(

Communist

to see all the calls for literal and actual (and not joking… not really) murder of people who participate in such wildly anti-communist practices as … <checks notes> “have bank accounts”.

I'm gonna need a source for this, that sounds too insane to be believable, and i've never seen anything like that.

y0kai

I'm one lol. Same with hexbear.

Maxnmy's

I was close to leaving. At first I'd been given the impression that "liberal" is a dirty word on Lemmy. It helps that PSAs like this one routinely appear on other instances to inform newcomers. Just keep spreading the knowledge and let it be known that everybody should block those communities.

aasatru

I often see people say that pointing new users towards instances with a lax attitude to defederation is a good idea. I kind of understand the rationale, but I'm not sure I agree. Pointing new users to an instance federated with Hexbear seems to me to be a terrible idea.

OpenStars

Blaze for example blocks all the political communities. That's... ... ... not entirely a normal thing that people are most likely to do and moreover to never *not* do that.

Btw, lemmy.cafe is literally the only instance I've ever even so much as heard of that blocks all of the big 3, including lemmy.ml.

Hadriscus

same, that was a weird first impression.

WhiteOakBayou

I've been here since the app exodus and see way more posts complaining about tankies than actual tankie unpleasantness in the popular and top posts. I think most people just looking at the popular posts would not come across any more unpleasantness than they'd see on reddit

OpenStars

This is b/c you are on lemmy.world, which defederated from both lemmygrad.ml and hexbear.net. So you only have the likes of lemmy.ml and midwest.social to contend with, which are nowhere near as extreme as those others.

Also, by the time of the Rexodus a lot of that drama had already been hashed out, hence posts like the OP are rare these days. But it is preserved if you want to seek it out.

A lot of what OP is talking about is the "unexpectedness" of making a comment that might seem reasonable to them (like "the Tiananmen Square massacre actually *did* happen tho"), and then shockingly they get banned even from communities that they had never even so much as heard of, never mind visited. The admins of that instance are VERY eager to whip out a VERY heavy ban hammer upon their slightest whim. Which is... fine, it's theirs to do with as they please, but some newer people (like OP) are shocked at how anti-democratic that seems, and wish that they had been told. Especially since if you read the sidebar of places such as lemmy.world, you would not expect that behavior - all the more so from an admin instance. Hence they tell others. And then new people join, and the tanky vs. anti-tanky cycle repeats:-D.

WhiteOakBayou

I think you make good points but isn't this thread about lemmy.ml and the OP on lemmy.world?

OpenStars , edited

First, the entire text is cross-posted from https://feddit.nl/post/16246531 - OP had nothing to add on their own, apparently. The OOP was likewise on feddit.nl. The community happens to be on Lemmy.world.

You also brought up your own personal experiences to add to the situation, so I pointed out that you, being on lemmy.world, would have different experiences than e.g. someone on feddit.nl. I note that that instance has not defederated from either lemmygrad.ml or hexbear.net. If you don't know what they are about, I'm saying that yes lemmy.ml are still "tankies", but like 1% of the problems of toxicity compared to those other two instances, so much so that while lemmy.world remains federated with lemmy.ml, it has chosen to defederate from both of those other two.

Also, don't miss the main reason for the drama in the first place: the images show the OOP being *banned*. i.e. what you do *not* see is the point here, bc of the heavy handed banning. So you wouldn't "see" it then, as you say just looking at the popular posts, unless you happened to have been viewing the mod log on your own initiative. The fact that any divergence of opinion is being suppressed is very much the point here. It leads to the creation of an echo chamber, which allows solely the opinions of the admins to be allowed to be spoken of.

But you need not simply believe me: check it out for yourself. e.g. go to lemmygrad.ml and see what is there - it took me (not joking) like *two seconds* to find this comment: "Shoot him in the head" at https://lemmygrad.ml/post/6010525, all the while making fun of Americans for being violent etc. (though when it happens on lemmy.ml - example, this one admittedly took a lot longer to find, maybe 30 seconds, though it was still on the front page - it *tends* to be far more tame) Note I am not complaining about the violent rhetoric here, but the total lack of self-awareness. USA=bad bc of genocide, while Russia and China are "not" doing genocide. It's a special brand of "my side good, their side bad", that I for one do not find very intellectually engaging. Therefore I do not choose to engage with Truth Social, or the equivalent Lemmy instances.

WhiteOakBayou

Thanks for the long and considered response. I did misread the post header the first time.

Lost_My_Mind

Wait, what's wrong with midwest.social?

SolOrion , edited

I didn't see much of it except for one burst where Hexbear was getting rowdy with my instance- that was.. annoying.

There was some drama I don't recall the specifics of but it apparently angered Hexbear enough that I started seeing a *lot* of them in basically every comment section.

TSG_Asmodeus (he, him)

I browse 'all' quite a bit, a few times a day, and I have had the same experience as you. I see more posts complaining about ".ml/tankies/etc" than I ever see problematic/whatever posts from them.

m_f

You're both on .world, which isn't federated with hexbear, which is the most annoying instance. They'll brigade other communities, for example the recent thread over at https://jlai.lu/post/11504685 (view it from that instance to see the hexbear comments)

I browse all sometimes from an instance federated with hexbear and I roll my eyes quite a bit whenever I do

WanderingVentra

Lemmy.world has like 80% of the lemmy fediverse or something like that, so this I'd a problem not thag many people are actually going to run into realistically.

Handles

Just to weigh in here with a bit of political nuance — "tankies" are certainly defined by their leftist politics, but moreso by their apologist defense of regimes that more or less transparently use socialist or communist maxims as a cover for state capitalism or straight out autocracy.

Tankies may be the loudest voices to claim themselves Marxist or socialist, but please don't mistake them as actually representing those ideologies truthfully or completely. Personally, I see tankies as more indebted to a cold war-style school of Soviet dogma transplanted to current autocracies. Marx and Trotsky would have rolled their eyes at either.

GBU_28

Unfortunately they take the mic and poison the conversation. Imo they hold back progressive adoption/discussion.

Handles

I don't disagree, therefore the attempt to disentangle the actual ideologies from the totalitarian stans who got stuck on '80s propaganda.

slaacaa

Yes, I hate to be “no true Scotsman”, but they are not actually leftists, just fan of a few dictatorships, some of which claim or used to claim to be socialist.

stardust

Yeah coming to lemmy and finding out about the so called communist reminded me more of those in favor of the small ruling elite like the pigs from Animal Farm was surprising. Not realizing they are the ones being sent to the glue factory while the pigs lounge around enjoying the lavish life in this so called communist workers paradise.

Reminded me nothing of socialists or at least what I think of socialism with it reminding me of more the monarchy. They seem more like nationalists who coopted socialism/communism to white wash what they actually support and overlooking the elite ruling class that they are not a part of.

Much like the fascists in Western countries who deny they are fascists and are for democracy while supporting ideas of coups for life time dictators that hold their views. Very similar groups.

givesomefucks

They seem more like nationalists who coopted socialism/communism to white wash what they actually support and overlooking the elite ruling class that they are not a part of.

...

Yes...

They're defenders of USSR and China....

So obviously they're not going to actually be socialis/communist.

The problem is when capitalists lump actuall socialists/communists with the fake ones.

OpenStars

Obvious to *you* (and me), yet somehow they themselves don't see it.

Cowbee [he/him]

Most modern Marxists are supportive of "AES." Something fairly common among the western left is left-anticommunism, something gone over in chapter 3 of *Blackshirts and Reds,* by Dr. Michael Parenti. A good article is *Why do Marxists Fail to Bring the "Worker's Paradise?"* It's a critical examination of AES and why Marxists tend to support AES despite *not* being "worker's paradises," and why AES states failed to live up to that utopian ideal.

PugJesus

Most modern Marxists are supportive of “AES.”

Ah, it's like the Bolsheviks being in the minority and declaring themselves the majority (literally what 'Bolshevik' means, while 'Menshevik', the actual majority, means minority) all over again.

zbyte64

It is like when racists say they’re race realists; it’s because the term “Soviet communism” isn’t that popular.

thedirtyknapkin , edited

what is, "aes"? it's usually best to define niche acronyms when using them in a general community.

the article you linked doesn't help, it's too niche for Google to help... autocratic ethnostate? authoritarian election trick?

ArcaneSlime

Eh, I disagree. Left isn't "when good," right isn't "when bad." There *are* bad leftists, and you're looking at them, right there on .ml, grad, and hexbear. These morons *actually* believe not only that "those states would have dissolved themselves given the opportunity if it wasn't for 'western interference,'" they also have such hubris to believe that if they tried the same thing they'd actually achieve what none of them did in the past. They can't grasp that *their* autocrats would never cede power *either* to usher in Communist Utopia™.

Cowbee [he/him] , edited

It's worth noting that when a Marxist says "stateless," they don't mean "governmentless." The Marxist theory of the state surrounds *classes,* while the Anarchist theory of the state surrounds *hierarchy.*

When an Anarchist says they want a stateless society, they envision a complex web of horizontal communes, networks of mutual aid, like a spiderweb.

When a Marxist says they want a stateless society, they envision a world Socialist republic that has managed to fully absorb all private property into the public sector, which no AES state has managed to accomplish thus far.

The idea that Marxists are advocating Socialist states to dissolve into Anarchism is wrong, nobody claims that. What Marxists claim is that *their notion of the state* will wither away, leaving a classless government.

That's also why Marxists are anti-Utopian, they don't advocate for Communism about a belief in its moral superiority, but because Capitalism naturally creates the conditions for it through free competition giving way to consolidation and monopolist syndicates, which can be siezed, publicly owned, and centrally planned.

ArcaneSlime

Actually users on .ml, hexbear, and thank god I'm able to avoid grad but probably them too, claim exactly that *all the time.* Might want to teach your own commerades instead of me, комиссар.

kuato

What exactly is the “that” that they claim all the time?

OpenStars

Just so you are aware, you are replying to a known troll. You will never, ever, ever, ever, ever, ever, ever, ever, ever, ever, ever, ever, ever, ever, ever, ever, ever, ever, ever, ever, ever, ever, ever, ever, ever, ever, ever, ever, ever, ever, ever, ever, ever, ever, ever, ever, ever, ever, ever, ever, ever get them to acknowledge your POV, unless that too is part of the tactic. That's just not how that works.

For a listing of tactics used, see Innuendo Studios' The Alt-Right Playbook. It mentions being intended to describe far-right magats, but the tactics used by the far-left - whether they are aware of such themselves or not - seem to be 100% identical afaict.

Cowbee [he/him]

Can you point to an example? I haven't seen any Marxist claim that Communism would be devoid of central planning and hierarchy. If you can point them out, I will be more than willing to correct them, though I am fairly certain you are misinterpreting their words given that you made the statement that "Anarchists and Marxists want the same thing."

socsa , edited

Right, and both of these ideas represent the same form of flawed modernist structuralism which has been largely supplanted by more contemporary theories which take a more pragmatic view on harm reduction as an iterative process in pursuit of post scarcity materialism. This is literally fucking Dengism, but if you say that people should do that stuff, and also value individual liberty, it's shitlib and the ppb spam. The entire problem is that so many MLs immediately reject any form of leftist revisionism which doesn't mesh with, questions, or even dares to reject the authoritarian traditions of Mao or Stalin as some kind of capitalist conspiracy which has infested western academia. This is as ridiculous as it is ignorant and seems to betray their underlying motivation not as one which seeks to uplift workers, but one which seems obsessed with some long defunct geopolitical rivalry. It's exhausting, and frequently very stupid, despite these people believing that they are some collective political ubermensch.

WanderingVentra

Really? I find libs way more interested in rehashing old Cold War arguments. They still reference Stalin and Mao all the time, like you are now, even though they've been dead a long time. Communists do advance leftist thought based on the conditions of each country, and usually that requires resisting US imperialism and yes, they of often make a lot of mistakes, but these are criticized or debated in leftist circles, but not usually among the libs, who rehash old, debunked arguments usually.

From what I've seen, most MLS support individual liberty but understand it's curtailing in situations where countries are still the US. The US and the west are still the most powerful empires in the world and they're still trying to destroy communism and do imperialism. That's why they support Israel's genocide. That's why they keep trying to do coups in Venezuela every election year, why the US still embargos Cuba, why they still are trying to get countries to privatize their natural resources for foreign companies and they destroy the whole country if they don't (like I'm Iraq or Syria), why they constantly try to yellow scare with China but don't give a fuck about the wars Saudi Arabia starts with other countries, it's why we have military bases in almost every country in the world. These things are still happening today, the US didn't just start becoming good and non-imperialist or pro-communist and no one wants to be like the USSR when it turned into Russia, where everything was sold off to the highest bidder and quality of life fell off a cliff that's only now just starting to recover again.

Handles , edited

No, completely fair point! I think on a platform with a lot of Americans (currently locked in an election where many seem to consider the centrist candidate "too far left") it's good to call out the differences on the [edit: *international*] left that aren't otherwise discerned.

socsa

This is why it's so frustrating, because tankies being overrepresented in online leftist spaces is one of the things which harms the acceptance of leftist ideals more than most of their imperialist windmills.

People aren't scared away from socialism by economic democracy, egalitarianism or radical direct action. They are scared away by confrontational and aggressive tankies defending tyrants, who seem to care more about relitigating random cold war drama than lifting up workers.

umbrella

that state capitalism was able to grow the poorest country in the world into one of the richest without relying on destroying the third world to do so.

that sounds like a step up to me.

Handles

without relying on destroying the third world

Whether you're talking about Russia or China here, both of those countries have massive resources, both natural and in terms of population. I'd argue that they didn't *have to* look for (other) third world countries to ruin; they had plenty of area and people of their own to turn to.

Also, a Lemmy ML user charging into the comments to defend state capitalism in oppressive regimes *kinda proves my point*.

Zoboomafoo

But can they hit the dismount back to communism?

zbyte64

You have a sales pitch that works for the poorest countries, what do you have for the wealthiest?

umbrella , edited

redistribution of wealth works for every country

also they are already fucking wealthy

givesomefucks , edited

Yeah, a little suspect OP's account is a week old with barely double digit posts/comments if you combine them and most are from this post....

I'm guessing their favorite (of many) accounts got blocked by .ml, so now they don't want anyone going there.

I don't get the .ml drama tho, never have. I realized it was a silly place long ago, so I blocked the whole instance.

I did the same for a couple others. It takes like two seconds.

Who cares if it has bigger communities than others? If that's all I cared about I'd still be on Reddit

I think a lot or people (like OP) can't drop this mindset because they're *not* on the fediverse willinging. It's probably the only social media site where IP bans aren't a thing. So people IP banned from the big ones, are gonna trickle down here and do dumb drama hunting shit like OP.

Cowbee [he/him]

I don't want to spiral this out of control, but I do think you might be interested in *Why do Marxists fail to Bring the "Worker's Paradise?"* as well as *Why Public Property?* The former is a critical examination of why states guided by Marxism haven't been worker utopias from the perspective of a Marxist-Leninist, the latter is an exploration of why Marx believed Socialism to overtake Capitalism. It isn't a moral argument, rather, as markets consolidate into monopolist syndicates devoid of competition, they make themselves ripe for public ownership and central planning.

*What is Socialism?* is also good, it goes over the various arguments between different strains of Marxism over what can be considered Socialist, but at this point I think I've recommended far more than enough articles. Really, the first one about "Worker's Paradises" is the one I think you'd find the most interesting.

Handles

Sure, those [Medium posts all by the same author that I've never heard of] look interesting enough at a glance — but I'll admit to only skimming them, and I'm not going to go any further down one random, person's online ruminations. Thanks for the offer, though.

Cowbee [he/him] , edited

I tend to recommend their posts because they are written in modern lingo and in the last decade, so there's specifically modern analysis there. I recommend Marx, Engels, etc. frequently as well, but a lot of their writing is several times longer and as such several times less likely to be read by people I recommend them to, perhaps with the exception of Engels' *The Principles of Communism,* which is a great and to-the-point intro to Marxism.

Feel free to DM me if you have any questions!

fuckingkangaroos

The Hexbear and .ml instances aren't really tankies/communists, IMHO. Some of them, sure, but mostly it's just a facade for their propaganda.

givesomefucks

A "tankie" isn't the same as a communist.

A "tankie" is someone that takes China's side (the tanks) in that famous picture of Tiananmen square.

Being a "tankie" is using communism as a facade for authoritarian governments where a small group of "upper party members" are essentially oligarchs.

OpenStars

They're not truly communists, but wouldn't they still be truly tankies then? Especially in the most literal sense of denying that the Tiananmen Square massacre even took place (or that anyone died from it, or that... whatever other BS interpretation the particular tanky you may read it from chooses to subscribe to)?

fuckingkangaroos

I think they're paid to spread disinformation (or run LLMs that spread it) that makes "the West" look bad and their authoritarian leaders (CCP, Kremlin) look good.

So if someone mentions Tiananmen Square they delete it or lie about it, or say "what about Mk ultra," but not because they actually believe in anything other than getting paid.

OpenStars

Never underestimate the utility of a useful idiot, who will do it for free (tm).

Though I will add that the West also does a *fantastic* job, at making itself look bad:-). In large part by actually being thus:-).

Though also the West tends to be fairly open about that - e.g. here's a segment from the Wikipedia page for Christopher Columbus:

Some historians have criticized Columbus for initiating the widespread colonization of the Americas and for abusing its native population.[300][114][301][302] On St. Croix, Columbus's friend Michele da Cuneo—according to his own account—kept an indigenous woman he captured, whom Columbus "gave to [him]", then brutally raped her.[303][r][s]

According to some historians, the punishment for an indigenous person, aged 14 and older, failing to pay a hawk's bell, or cascabela,[306] worth of gold dust every six months (based on Bartolomé de las Casas's account) was cutting off the hands of those without tokens, often leaving them to bleed to death.[296][114][307]

So our sins tend to be on full public view - Donald Trump's suing anyone who criticizes him in order to shut them up notwithstanding - while in contrast, try saying something like "the Tiananmen Square massacre happened", and see how fast you get banned from Lemmy.ml. They are not the same! (the badness of The West that acknowledges errors yet does nothing whatsoever to counteract them, vs. tankies who don't even seem to be aware of the simplest of basic facts!)

Anyway, be advised that we must stop this conversation here - the last time I even so much as *questioned* whether Dessalines was receiving money from the Chinese government (as someone said, which I included an exact URL to iirc) or the Russian one, to develop the Lemmy codebase (nothing necessarily nefarious there by itself - grants *should* be sought out, no?), my comments were removed. In fact, I only have 3 comments removed across the entire Fediverse for the past 10 months that I've had this account, and all 3 were removed for talking negatively about Lemmy.ml. i.e. this conversation is not on lemm.ee that welcomes a diversity of ideas - we are at risk right now of being removed just for what we've said so far. So, I guess, if you want to criticize them further, don't spend too much time typing it all out I suppose:-).

Gammelfisch

My post criticizing China's high-speed rail network was yanked. I was surprised and immediately thought of Reddit.

JeeBaiChow

Same. Their SCS incursion and claiming it as their own.

EatATaco

Where on reddit was as bad as .ml? Other than maybe the Donald or conservative?

muculent , edited

These are just my thoughts based on what I've read so far. Do what you will with it. This is just my general advice.

If you like a community on an instance, make friends on it. If you network with enough individuals that feel the same way about a community that you do, fork that community onto a new instance and carry on. I see others weighing in on too much control, not enough control, defederate, remove moderator or admin control from individuals that censor, ban, or lean one direction over another. You'll find these power dynamics are more prevalent or less prevalent depending on the instance you're on or communities your partipate in. If you feel strongly enough about it, be the change you want to see and determine what best course of action you should take that is within your power. Whatever you choose I hope you find or potentially create a community or instance that works best for you.

Dasus , edited

One of the mods over there is a Russian who refuses to answer whether he's pro-Russian or not, says Russian propaganda doesn't exist, pretends to be American while intensely engaging in American threads, denies Uighur genocide, etc etc etc.

https://lemmy.world/u/davel@lemmy.ml

https://lemmygrad.ml/u/davel

He has some older account where there was Russian being used but I think he may have deleted it or I just can't be arsed to look enough rn.

Anyway, one of the clearest pro-Russian trolls I've seen. Lemmy.ml is full of them, I don't know why lemmy.world federates with them.

Edit. Now he comments only when post is locked. Hey Davel, are you a pro-Russian troll? Reply to this and ignore the bit about being pro-Russian, won't you? ;>

Edit2 I came on PC to look up the link which he had forgotten in which he's posted using Russian/Ukrainian (I don't recognise which one), and the comments I've made about him have *weirdly* been removed. Something that would require a mod. But Pro-Russian Putler-dick loving trolls would never do something like *remove comments that disagree with them* while actively avoiding answering questions like "why do you support Putin?" "why are you pro-Russian?" You literally circle-jerk with Yogthos about how you're "definitely not a mouthpiece for Russian propaganda", while refusing to answer something as simple as "are you pro-Russian". It's **cringe. If you had grown up in the west, you'd actually know how ridiculous you sound. :D

Rhoeri

Knew exactly who you were taking about before I even saw the links.

sunzu2

Linux sub?

szynaptic

Because LW is just as bad.

.ml is run by angry tankie assholes.

LW is run by moral superiority assholes.

Assholes, assholes everywhere.

Rhoeri

But .ee is where all the cool kids hang out, right?

szynaptic

I expected this type of response from idiots who think "omg this guy insulted my instance... that means they insulted *me!!!!*"

davel

Wait, now I’m a Russian pretending to be an American? This tale gets taller every time you tell it 😂

He has some older account where there was Russian being used but I think he may have deleted it or I just can’t be arsed to look enough rn.

Draconic NEO

“So what, it’s the fediverse, you can use another instance.”

Dismissal of this type of criticism by just telling people to use another instance or saying "fediverse is decentralized" is unproductive, and honestly should be called out as harmful because it ignores the fact that instances when they become large enough and centralized enough, carry weight and can be extremely problematic like shown here.

A big part of dealing with these types of problems is to make people aware of them, another one is to deal with it at the instance level by defederating the problematic instances and cutting off the communities so that network effect doesn't continue to rear its ugly head. Just creating new communities isn't enough, if it was this wouldn't be the problem that it is. When people tell others to stop complaining and dismiss the criticism because the fediverse is decentralized it seems like they either don't understand the issue, or they would just rather it not be addressed.

So while many people would prefer we just leave well enough alone, that's not condusive to these problems being dealt with, people need to talk about them, and action needs to be taken.

Carrolade

As the dev's flagship instance, there is only so much that can be done. There is also only so much that *should be* done, since they should have the right to run their own instance however they see fit. They did put the work in to create the service, after all.

I think the most reasonable solution around this is to simply push mbin a little harder. Since .ml will always garner a certain degree of attention as the dev's instance, simply pivoting more attention to a lemmy-related service may be the best option to make us more appealing to less politically-interested people overall.

OpenStars

And shout-out to Piefed and Sublinks as well. All three of those look so promising! They have a bit of catching up to do but... yeah, I agree with you. Plus, being written in a more widely-known language (the likes of Python vs. Rust), I would hope that it would catch up rather quickly?

Draconic NEO

There is also only so much that should be done, since they should have the right to run their own instance however they see fit.

Disagreed, I've seen them trying to force their hand on other instances into running things the way they want them to, so I think it's only fair others hold them to some standards as well. After all in the Fediverse there is some leverage you do have to get other instances to compromise, by way of simply refusing to operate with them anymore. Obviously that doesn't mean completely bossing them around, which is why I said compromise, not comply. It also is still their choice whether or not to follow through, it comes at the cost of them no longer inter-operating with servers they refuse to compromise with, but I think that's more than fair enough as a trade off.

It is also a good idea to push for alternatives, but even so, if the issue isn't addressed it will still be problematic on those problems due to the size and weight the instance and its communities carry in the Fediverse.

WanderingVentra

Do you have an example of how they've tried to force their hand on other instances? That's not really a thing they can do...

MyOpinion

Yes avoid .ml and hexbear and life is mostly good here.

Jrockwar

What's the problem with hexbear, is it the same? Genuine question - I think the only community in hexbear I follow is "Gaming" and it's reasonably civil there.

GiantChickDicks

I can only speak to my own experience. Most of their communities I've seen are not a place where nuanced views are appreciated. I saw a particularly 4Chanesque take where a guy was trashing a girl he dated for her interest in astrology. He was more than fine supporting it and humoring it while they were together. Once dumped, though, he had to use it as an example of everything he had to be tortured with in the relationship.

I had a couple of things to say about that kind of attitude, but the whole of my response centered around learning to pick partners who are aligned with our own values and goals. They banned me because of my username. I have no idea why, other than making assumptions about my views and values in a negative way. A peep into my post history should suggest otherwise, but anyway.

I don't have a lot of respect for people with strong views that are sensitive about having them challenged. It isn't a good faith argument.

OpenStars

It isn’t a good faith argument.

This nicely summarizes enormous portions of lemmygrad.ml, hexbear.net, and a lesser though still quite sizeable proportion of lemmy.ml.

Monstrosity

Hexbear is way worse, imo. Those folks will straight up harass dissenters. Stay away or maybe just stick to your gaming sub if you're happy there.

OpenStars

The hexbear community predated Lemmy iirc, so they have existed in an isolated bubble for a *very* long time. Imagine edgy teenagers with an axe to grind and no particular reason to avoid grinding it on anything that they set their sights onto.

Despite running off so much of their own community members, including some actual developers, they seem happy with the way they are. Sadly, they are also happy to spread out from their instance and fuck up everyone else's day as well - rulez be damned. Notably, they continually keep floating the idea of defederating *themselves* from the rest of the Fediverse - I mean ofc those instances that have not already cut them off - so if that gives you an idea of what is going on (they are *aware* of their toxicity, they simply choose to not *care*).

That particular community might be fine though. Or not. Either way it's probably more tolerable than many hexbear users that you will see in general across the Fediverse. You'll see for yourself.

Cowbee [he/him]

Hexbear has Marxists and Anarchists, it's a non-sectarian "left-unity" instance. Lemmy.ml is admin'd and moderated by Marxists and some Anarchists. Similar, but different.

aasatru

non-sectarian "left-unity"

Lol. I'm a social democrat. They'd send me to a camp if they had the chance to.

Then again, when put in charge of things they sent each other to camps as well, so maybe this is what tankie unity looks like.

Cowbee [he/him]

To be fair, the only people who consider Social Democrats to be "left" are Social Democrats and the people to the right of them. Most people use "left" to refer to anti-capitalism, be it Socialism, Communism, Syndicalism, Anarchism, etc, and not to refer to Capitalism but with large safety nets.

aasatru

Case in point.

zbyte64

Frankly I find this view disregards the differing material conditions that are present. Social Democrats are left of what the Americas have now, just like Capitalism was to the left of having a Monarchy. Your take is a-historical, anti-materialist, and thus anti-marxist.

taipan , edited

Most people use "left" to refer to anti-capitalism, be it Socialism, Communism, Syndicalism, Anarchism, etc, and not to refer to Capitalism but with large safety nets.

Yikes, your Overton window is completely unbalanced if you think that "most people" exclude liberal progressives from the "left". Look at any mainstream news channel or read any mainstream news website, and you'll see that most people have a much more inclusive definition of left-wing politics, which encompasses center-left politics.

lemmydividebyzero

My experience: I saw a post on hexbear and only one view was present in the comments below... I did not know them then... So. I thought: Let's share my view.

In the end, I got blocked for arguing and they removed my comment. And the people who responded to my comment with burning flags of a country and wanted its total destruction had nothing to fear. It was the most disgusting experience I have ever had on Lemmy.

But after they removed my comment, I understood why there is only 1 view present... Because the other view gets removed.

I wondered what you wrote, unfortunately it seems like it was on a different account as there is zero things in the (hexbear) modlog for this username.

ToucheGoodSir

The man, the myth.. the fact checker

Lost_My_Mind

.......how you gonna call her male when she lists just about every pronoun in existence in her username EXCEPT for he/him?

lemmydividebyzero

It was on a different account. I switched to an instance with downvotes disabled, because the experience on Lemmy started to feel too much like Reddit...

But trust me: It did not even remotly justify posting burning flags of a country with mods supporting that. Actually, I'm surprised... I'd expect that this is still normal on hexbear. Can't imagine, they changed that much in just 6 months...

MyOpinion

Hexbear is just as toxic as ml. They will bait you to comment on topics and then remove your comments if they don’t like them. Just a terrible group of people.

This is the problem with hexbear: they lure you in with things like gaming and then you start agreeing with them that none should go hungry or homeless and once you realize it, you've become a trans redfash tankie gobbunist (/s)

LiberalSoCalist

the problem with hexbear is the same handful of users that have made it their hobby to complain incessantly about hexbear all over the fediverse

SorteKanin

Sounds hollow coming from an instance that doesn't even defederate hexbear.

lemmydividebyzero

My instance does not block them either, but I do.

Had 2 experiences where they tried to silence me via blocking me... And one time, the people I argued with and who wanted the total destruction of a state and posted burning flags of it did not get blocked or warned. I hope, they stay in their echo chamber and don't ever leave their homes...

SorteKanin

User blocking merely blocks their communities. You'll still see comments from the instance and you'll still see posts in other communities from their users. You'll also still have their votes influence your feed.

Defederation is the more proper tool to use. Individual user blocking is not effective.

lemmydividebyzero

My instance has downvotes disabled. Only upvotes matter. So, at least, I don't see destructive voting...

And as long, as I don't post in their communities, they can't silence me and have to deal with my view differently than just by removing it..

WanderingVentra , edited

Hexbear doesn't have downvotes either actually. That seems to be the main reason they brigade. Everyone has to comment to show their negative opinion on something.

socsa , edited

Honestly I think the .ml folks have shown themselves to be such zealots that they should be considered a potential security threat to the broader fediverse.

The more places defederate from them, the more opportunity and initiative there will be for alternatives to their largest communities to grow.

finitebanjo , edited

One of the problems is that Lemmy.ml is literally run by some of the people who developed Lemmy and it's one of the few instances on https://join-lemmy.org/instances and the one with the highest number of users listed there with the exception of lemmynsfw.

imaqtpie

It also has less users than sh.itjust.works and lemm.ee. And way less compared to lemmy.world but I guess they aren't linked on the joinlemmy site for some reason

WanderingVentra

It was removed from it to avoid over centralization on the fediverse. It already has like 80% of users

P4ulin_Kbana

one with the highest number of users listed there with the exception of lemmynsfw.

Why? Just why?

finitebanjo

Fully anonymous porn viewing is something very much coveted, and there is also a huge industry whose target audience is net denizens so you could also make an argument that the number of users is inflated by the industry users.

P4ulin_Kbana

I mean, I don't believe it's really that anonymous, and it's an actual "industry", more of people posting their photos.

kuato , edited

This is the most hyperbolic take yet 😂 *I can no longer sit back and allow Communist infiltration, Communist indoctrination, Communist subversion and the international Communist conspiracy to sap and impurify all of our precious fediverse memes.*

Edit to add: oic, your alts keep getting banned

TexMexBazooka

Yeah the moderation on .ml is insane, users are better off letting them fester in their toxic little bubble.

They’re falling behind in MAUs, slowly but surely. It’ll work itself out.

synae[he/him]

Not everything is about growth. If that instance's userbase or activity plateaus I'm sure they won't mind at all.

Valmond

MAU?

TexMexBazooka

Monthly Active Users

It’s a user that has posted/commented within the last 30 days, and it’s the best metric for measuring the activity of an instance

Successful_Try543 , edited

MAU: monthly active users

OpenStars , edited

(1) shoutout to the community at !newtolemmy@lemmy.ca for helping guide people into things like how to make a functioning link to communities and users, and I posted something there myself mentioning a variety of ways to curate someone's experiences, e.g. to block extremist content. I would share a link to that here... except links to posts are not fully functional on the Fediverse, since they take you off of your home instance and require jumping through hoops to avoid that. Also, if that community does not show up for you, like if visiting that link it looks empty, then subscribe to it and wait about a day. The Fediverse is *not* so easy to use as people keep saying it is...

Though ironically, as you said, what's the point when nobody even knows of that community's existence. Worse yet, a lot of "guides" pointed to in the sidebar of a large number of instances either have next to no information, or at most only a single years-old post with a ton of comments like "thanks" and "^THIS" that you cannot easily get past b/c of how the Lemmy web UI makes you load only a portion before making you go to the bottom and load another, and another, and another, and another... almost none of which have anything useful to add, and yet the instance admins (which people like Blaze and I have specifically told) choose not to point to a "community", and instead leave those years-old links to posts. Speaking of, and funny enough, in the case of lemmy.ml go to the sidebar and click the "What is Lemmy.ml" - the result is hilariously on-brand!:-P

(2) measuring community engagement stats can be tricky - for one thing, the numbers when viewed from an external instance are often wrong, but going to the home instance and looking in the sidebar iirc offers the true values. Also, "subscribed" means next to nothing, and instead active users per month (AMU) is where it's at. With that in mind then:

  • linux@lemmy.ml has 2.23k AMUs
  • linux@lemmy.world has 1.39k AMUs
  • after that it drops precipitously, e.g. linux@sh.itjust.works has just 36 AMUs

Still, linux@lemmy.world is not nothing, with 39% of these users - a lower-bound estimate since many people are likely subscribed to both.

(3) And Linux@lemmy.ml is the #3 community on that instance. The large majority of the other communities - asklemmy, memes, news, privacy, technology, etc. - all have counterparts on other instances.

One counterexample that is pretty bad is firefox, with lemmy.ml vs. lemmy.world having 3.82k vs. 0.72 AMUs, respectively.

So, do whatever you want, but it is what it is. Personally I've user-blocked lemmy.ml b/c... well, you can see it yourself from the replies to your post here, it's just not worth the hassle of having to receive such in my feed (though sadly, user-blocking seems to make extraordinarily little difference compared to not doing such). All I can suggest is that while it may not be "easy", we can each of us be a part of the change that we want to see in the world. Find, subscribe to, and POST on communities that you would like to see grow.

secret300

Don't use lemmy.ml then?

EatATaco

Read the post?

OpenStars

Genuine question: HOW though?!? I've user-blocked the entire instance, yet I see those comments basically everywhere I go, plus they used to not be able to reply to me and have a notification sent to me, but now on 0.19.5 that seems to have been un-done. In *no way* is a user-block like a personal defederation.

Also, fully 100% (not making this up) of everyone that I have told Lemmy about irl has said that this issue is why they refused to join the Fediverse. As the number of alt accounts goes up (some of them mine) yet the total number remains mostly constant, that spells doom for us eventually.

And it is not fair to the users of lemmy.ml either, for the rest of us to see the instance they come from and immediately brace ourselves for an onslaught - thereby potentially misinterpreting what they say, just b/c their fellows are so arrogant and insensitive and we have come to expect that from them.

The whole "just ignore the cancer and it will go away" approach leaves much to be desired, imho. Feel free to do as you please, but that's not what I am talking about: you asked, and as a result now you know *some* (certainly not *all*) of the reasons why others may not wish to do the same.

jagged_circle

Moderation is definitely a problem. I see low effort posts getting a pass all over the place, where others who take the time to write a long, thoughtful, respectful analysis get banned.

OpenStars

YSK that it is not length, but whether what you tried to say is agreed to by the admin of the instance or not. *That* is the crux of the dilemma here: that goes against the philosophies of the Western world about non-authoritarian control, which ostensibly so too does true communism, yet here we are: the USA is "doing genocide" and "is capitalist", yet neither Russia nor China are any of those things (in their minds). This makes them a "leftist" instance in the same manner that Trump supporters are "conservative" - which is to say, not.

lambalicious

I’m not sure if there’s a solution here, but I’d like to urge people to avoid lemmy.ml hosted communities in favor of communities on more reasonable instances.

It depends on what exactly do you consider the problem to be, but my understanding is that solutions to the more general problem of "what server a community is in" are already in the works (multicommunities and stuff).

As for a more local kind of change... Be the change you want to see. Start up, and maintain, those alt communities that would serve as counterweights to the ones that are in .ml. Also, understand why they are in .ml in the first place yet still manage to function.

helloworld55 , edited

Frankly, who cares? If you don't want to see or participate in tankie propoganda, then don't. People point out that lemmy.ml is the hub for a lot of communities, so it isn't reasonable to switch to another instance. And then they bring up communities like !Linux@lemmy.ml Guess what, Linux isn't meant to be a hub for political discourse, and for the most part, it isn't. Use lemmy.ml how you want to use it, and if you want to participate in other political leanings, go to a different instance. No one is really stopping you, and that's the whole idea of the fediverse. And there really isn't any value lost, because this isn't a "choose one and only one" situation. You've got all of the fediverse at your fingertips

[HTML_REMOVED] So this came off a bit abrasive. But the point I want to convey is that if you want to have deep/heated political discourse, either do that on a community (and instance) suitable for it, or use an account specifically for political discussion. I think it helps everyone. The mods can referee communities with more clear boundaries, the lurkers/users don't need to worry about political debates when looking up tech support or whatever, and you (the reader/political dissident) can still enjoy your discussions with less worry about being randomly banned. [HTML_REMOVED]

Solar Bear , edited

Use lemmy.ml how you want to use it, and if you want to participate in other political leanings, go to a different instance. No one is really stopping you, and that's the whole idea of the fediverse. And there really isn't any value lost, because this isn't a "choose one and only one" situation. You've got all of the fediverse at your fingertips.

Until you make the mistake of replying with the wrong kind of comment to the wrong sub, and get banned from the entire instance and lose the ability to post on many of the largest subs on this side of the fediverse. Or maybe they just see you out and about and decide to ban you on sight because they don't like what you said. There's nothing stopping that.

Admin overreach and abuse is a major issue for the fediverse because it affects more than just the user in question. Admins of large instances get to decide who has access to the users and communities on their instances, and very often the users of the instance aren't even aware of the actions taken on their behalf. Mastodon recently implemented a notification for when blocks and defederation remove your follows or followers, and this is a great first step. Users deserve to know when they are impacted by decisions such as these.

I love the fediverse and want to see it thrive, so we need to stop putting our heads in the sand on this issue. It's always discussed as if it's an issue with a few problematic instances rather than the systemic issue in need of a solution that is is. Admins need the tools to protect their instances from real abuse, but we need to balance that with the right of the users to know what's going on and not be unfairly deprived of the social aspect of this social media experiment, especially without knowing.

EatATaco

It's shocking to me when people say that reddit moderators are more overbearing than here. They'll literally ban you for how you vote here. Lol

doctortran , edited

I feel like I've been saying it from the beginning, but for all of the problems Reddit has that Lemmy ostensibly solves, it opens the door for far worse moderation problems than Reddit had.

We can shit talk Reddit admins all night and day, but their long-standing and often problematic insistence on neutrality was nevertheless beneficial for the site's growth.

And I think one of the fundamental problems with Lemmy is that too many of the people in charge of various instances don't have a similar philosophy. They want to choke the place, and curate it to their exact specifications, for their own individual reasons.

Which would be fine in a vacuum. But in a federated space, what is done on one instance can have a wide ranging effect on the visibility of content outside of that instance. And as op rightfully points out, because communities are locked to an individual instance, the nature of federation doesn't help users escape overbearing moderation when the only true sizable communities for a thing happen to be on a specific instance.

OpenStars , edited

In short, we are trying to turn Lemmy into a Reddit clone, when it is a different toolbox with a different purpose.

Personally I think that people were just so *burned out* from leaving Reddit, that they just accepted whatever else they could find. Many did not even do that much - I have no idea where a great many of the content creators went, some seemingly went back to X, others from there onto Bluesky, but notably many seemed to have simply left social media altogether. And until this next USA election is over, that's probably for the best...

Anyway, I am saying that people no longer feel the desire to put in the hard work that it takes to moderate a community. Some very few seem to shoulder the vast majority of the work, but it is not spread out. And ironically, this wraps back around to the OP issue, b/c the presence of such toxicity is precisely the reason why (okay well tbf among the top 3 lets say) I, who was a mod of two gaming subs on Reddit, did not want to volunteer my time here. 99% of the effort ends up going to deal with 1% of the people, I am talking about the people for whom "no means yes", i.e. those who e.g. create alt accounts to get around bans and just keep going.

Also, the tools and infrastructure just aren't really here yet. e.g., what concept could be more foundational than "helping guide new users to how Lemmy works?" Do a little digging and you will be fantastically depressed to learn the state of affairs there. e.g. Lemmy.ml's sidebar features a post titled "What is Lemmy.ml", except that is a broken link to a post that must have been removed at some point. And that is the chief instance of Lemmy!? Lemmy.world's status is not much better, pointing to a neat Quick start guide, but so very many features (e.g. cross-posting, and in fact I only count a singular occurrence of the word "instance" in the entire thing). Notably, there is an entirely community to help people get acclimated to Lemmy, called !newtolemmy!newtolemmy@lemmy.ca (yes, that link is messed up, but I left it that way b/c this is how the webUI chose to expand it out - Lemmy is *not* polished, and is in fact *broken* in so many ways!), but have you ever heard of that community prior to my mentioning it here? Also nobody has posted to it in the last ten months except 3 posts from Blaze and I. We've asked instance admins to add this community - or some other one like it - to the sidebar of their instances but... crickets. (edit: though lemmy.cafe has it in their top banner, yay - that instance looks so damn *welcoming* and *friendly*!!:-)

Sadly, what I conclude from this is that this is still an alpha-level "experiment" in social media. I thought that we were at least in beta but... if so, it is quite low-level. We seem stuck in this downwards spiral where the people aren't willing to put forth effort b/c the infrastructure isn't quite fully here yet. Perhaps Mbin, Piefed, or Sublinks will offer greater hope?

WanderingVentra

But communities aren't really locked to a particular instance. Anyone can start a community that's a clone from another instance and nothing stops everyone from migrating to that new one. Blaze has already pulled it off multiple times. If everyone doesn't like the community on ml, then they can go to one made on another instance super easy. You can't do that on Reddit without adding a 2 on the end or something. That's the beauty of the fediverse.

moosetwin

stuff like this is why I have ml and hexbear in my blocklist, they don't deserve my traffic

Draconic NEO

You may want to consider the fact that instance blocks on the user side don't actually effect that, they are not in any way like defederation, not by a long shot. They simply filter communities from those instances, and not much else. It doesn't even hide user interactions from those instances.

Admiral Patrick , edited

They simply filter communities from those instances, and not much else. It doesn't even hide user interactions from those instances.

Yep. "Block instance" is basically "block all communities on this instance". Its API-level behavior leaves a lot to be desired.

Some UIs will filter users from blocked instances (posts and comments). I know Tesseract does, and I think maybe Boost does?

OpenStars

Oh that's so awesome! Mbin, Piefed, Sublinks, and even if Tesseract is *currently* running Lemmy (though I thought you mentioned wanting to switch it to Sublinks or something when that gets ready), it too helps mitigate some of the known issues. I do have enormous respect for the hard work and effort put into the Lemmy codebase... but I am even more excited to think about the possibilities of growth that lie ahead!:-)

Draconic NEO

I mean I think that's the idea, they didn't want people blocking the instance to disrupt normal discussions by hiding the users.

Their intent wasn't to offer an alternative to defederation, but rather for blocking all an instance's communities manually.

SorteKanin

You really should join an instance that defederates from those instances. That is the way to actually "vote" on the fediverse, not via simple user blocking that doesn't actually achieve what you think it does, as the other reply points out.

OpenStars

There is only a singular instance in the entire Fediverse that blocks all of the big 3 including lemmy.ml, from what I can see: lemmy.cafe. And roughly a month ago it was still federated with hexbear.net - though that was due to a bug/oversight and when it was pointed out to the admin was immediately corrected. It is a tiny instance, with only 18 users per day or 44 per month, which leaves me wondering how "robust" it is - how long has it been in operation? How long would it expect to remain? (I recall instances such as dmv.social dying off with little to no notice, though that was due to the CSAM attacks that have since been mitigated by software).

I may switch to them regardless - they have some *nice* features (including a link for new users to check out !newtolemmy@lemmy.ca - so friendly and welcoming!!:-), though was waiting for the likes of Sublinks, Piefed, and Mbin to catch up a bit in case they would be better than any implementation of Lemmy. Anyway I've been busy irl lately and not wanting to spend time thinking about this.

I say all this in case my personal example could help illustrate: there are barriers to switching.:-) Though I don't know if everyone suddenly jumping onto that same instance would count as much of a "vote", and especially people *not* doing such shouldn't count as a vote in the opposite direction, either? Though I do take your point, ultimately we cannot control others, only ourselves, so it is our "fault" for accepting the way that things are now, rather than seeking to change them.

Also if it helps to add: many people feel that communities such as firefox@lemmy.ml that have ~2/3rds of all monthly active users for a firefox-specific community essentially hold hostage the content that they want to see, without an account that can interact with it. Ideally the politics would be separated from the non-political content - much like the NSFW tag + especially the settings button to filter out such if desired - allows us all to exist in the same space free of any conflict (barring the occasional outlier, which I've seen only like once or twice in the entirety of last year), however, people (such as users of those big 3 instances) refuse to label their politically extremist content, and do other things not in good faith like brigade even instance-specific communities (I can find an example if you like, also relevant is that the option to set them to "private" does not exist until... is it 0.19.6 iirc?).

So for some people, it is not enough to simply leave, they want to help migrate everyone out. By increasing awareness of the situation.

eldavi

in the fediverse; blocklists only serves to remove you from the group chat that everyone else can see.

Itdidnttrickledown

I censored them. All of them.

SorteKanin

You mean you personally blocked them? You need to actually be on an instance that defederates them for it to mean anything. User blocking hardly does anything, it just hides communities from that instance, that's all it does.

Itdidnttrickledown

No I just blocked the instance. While there is a chance those mods could be mods on other servers. The hamfisted and out right petty ways they employ are less likely to get a pass elsewhere. I have no doubt many lemmy.ml users are okay. Its just the reddit style modding that I'm avoiding.

Cowbee [he/him] , edited

All instances, except for the lightly moderated ones, have censorship issues from time to time. You can say one thing on one thread, and that same thing can get you banned in another thread on the same instance. This is an issue with the great degree of political polarization on Lemmy.

My point is that Lemmy is multipolar. It’s divided between the right-leaning instances like Lemmy.world and sh.itjust.works, the left-leaning instances like Lemmy.ml, slrpnk.net, blahaj.zone, and dbzer0, and the leftist instances like Hexbear.net and Lemmygrad.ml. Mods and admins on each instance are guilty of maintaining the “instance line.”

When I called them out on their one sided censorship, with a screenshot of the modlog above, I promptly received a community ban on all communities on lemmy.ml that I had ever participated in.

While I won't repeat what got me banned, this is what got me banned from Political Memes on Lemmy.world, this isn't just a Lemmy.ml thing. This is also when one of the moderators claimed they weren't censoring anyone and were incredibly fair on a comment chain calling out their censorship, and refused to elaborate. They would not even tell me how I could edit my comments to comply with their rules.

What does this all mean?

Honestly, I think close to everyone knows that Marxists dominate Lemmy.ml, Lemmygrad.ml, Hexbear.net, etc. I think close to everyone knows Liberals dominate Lemmy.world. I think everyone knows that anarchists dominate dbzer0, slrpnk.net, Hexbear.net, etc.

If your call to action is to defederate Lemmy.ml, then that's just contributing to this polarization effect, as people would jump ship from .world and .ml to the other if it fits their views better. If your call to action is that people should move communities from Lemmy.ml to other instances, this has already happened a bit, this thread gets reposted very frequently. All it really seems to me is that you're spreading drama.

What do I recommend?

Rather than trying to consolidate communities across instances, replicate communities as needed. Communities on Lemmy are more like hashtags for an instance, and instances are more like subreddits of old. Instances have their own cultures and values, so a Gaming thread on Hexbear, for example, is going to be different from a Lemmy.world Gaming thread, and that's *a good thing.* All sorting can still let you see other instances, there's no need to risk moderator dominance over communities by trying to consolidate on a single instance. Heck, this community is an example of that very process.

DudeImMacGyver , edited

Lemmy.world and sh.itjust.works don't seem to have any noticeable political leanings (far right or far left) as far as I can tell. Why do you say they're right leaning?

brucethemoose

Lemmy.world and sh.itjust.works don’t seem to have any noticeable political leanings as far as I can tell.

...What?

I consider myself a raging liberal, at least in the US. *A* socialist. But lemmy.world is so liberal it makes me feel like a Trumpster.

I guess I don't feel at risk of getting *globally* banned like I would for disagreeing with the consensus like on .ml, but claiming .world is neutral is quite a sweeping statement.

Stovetop

There are definitely some bad actors on here who are trying to manipulate the election in Trump's favor. The sort that claim to be leftists and come to every US politics-related thread (or even ones that aren't related to the US until they make it so) with their list of talking points about why no one should vote for Harris, but conveniently have no answers for who deserves votes more.

ArcaneSlime

Because anyone not exactly in line with his views is right leaning, that's it. Tankies want to shame you into their ideology by calling you right leaning for thinking murder is bad, that's basically all.

umbrella

from the perspective of a south american, yes, .world is biased towards north america and europe.

DudeImMacGyver

That's not really what I mean, I'm talking about leaning far right or left on the political spectrum. I think both of them are based in NA, so it would make sense they're more focused there, just like midwest.social

barsquid

I don't fully understand but it turns out if you don't think both Donald and Harris are equally fascist you are a classic liberal and pretty far to the right.

queermunist she/her

They're not equally fascist.

It's fascism lite vs fascism deluxe!

barsquid

Right? The system is awful that lite is the best of the options that will actually happen. And yet here you are, every day campaigning for fascism deluxe by telling everyone who chooses lite that they are genocidal goose-steppers.

queermunist she/her

Harris wouldn't support genocide if she knew it would cost her the election. There would be an arms embargo by now if it weren't for her voters reassuring her; "No no, it's okay! You can kill anyone you want and start WW3 and we'll still vote for you."

But calling you all genocidal goose-steppers isn't fair. You're just cynical. You fundamentally do not believe you can change anything.

Cowbee [he/him]

I can DM you if you want, this is already spiraling far beyond my intentions of my original statement, that I think it's better rather than to consolidate communities and overpower an instances mods and admins, to decentralize and replicate so there's always a space for people, on an as-needed basis.

The short answer is that Lemmy.world is a very US-focused liberal instance, essentially the Democrats embodied in an instance.

Sh.itjust.works maintains NCD, MeanwhileOnGrad, and other generally pro-Liberalism, anti-Communist communities, hence why I say it *leans* right.

As always, you can absolutely find Anarchists and Communists on both Lemmy.world and sh.itjust.works, my point is more that the moderators and userbase generally consolidate around a given stance, my point isn't that you *can't* be a leftist on Lemmy.world or sh.itjust.works.

givesomefucks

World is kind of the vanilla instance.

Just.works is a "free speech" instance, I never see many communities hosted there, but a large amount of trolls make accounts there because just.works is unlikely to nuke an account.

Draconic NEO

Lately sh.itjust.works been more good about nuking spam and troll accounts, and they also have automated defenses set up to mitigate abuse.

Shiggles

Neither .world nor .shitjustworks are “right leaning” they just hate the tankies most vocally lmao. Neither would it make too much sense to call a tankie “left” leaning given their raging hard on for authoritarianism. I also think most of Blahaj would be offended by being lumped in with them.

Cowbee [he/him] , edited

Lemmy.world is extremely liberal, I wouldn't classify it as left-leaning. Both .world and sh.itjust.works are generally liberal, maintaining MeanwhileOnGrad leads to more right-wing people. I did not say *far-right,* or even *right-wing,* but *right-leaning.*

Marxists are absolutely left wing, not sure what your point is here. Marx and Engels were both called "authoritarian" by their contemporaries so much that Engels wrote *On Authority.* I don't think it makes sense to separate Marxism from Leftism, and redefine leftism as Anarchism.

Shiggles

muh libs aren’t left leaning

And you expect me to take anything you say after that seriously

AlligatorBlizzard

By the standards of US and Canadian politics, yeah we're to the left of center. But "center" has been dragged to the right so far that it's prompting this whole argument. The Overton window had shifted so far that liberalism - which, in a current context, supports relatively unregulated capitalism and trickle down economics - there's a whole swath of political ideologies that's basically nonexistent within our modern day electoral politics. I'm somewhere in the anarchist range and choose to engage with electoral politics - if they chose to participate within the context of a FPTP voting system with two options, we'd find ourselves voting for the same candidate despite our likely highly differing political beliefs. In many countries that left wing is less smashed, the range of political discourse is much wider.

Shit just works is to the left side of, but comfortably within, the current Canadian Overton window. In a global sense, the instance is kinda to the right, in the same way that Bernie Sanders is moderate by western European standards.

Cowbee [he/him]

When I say Leftist, I am using the typical definition, anti-Capitalist. Socialism, Communism, Syndicalism, Anarchism, and all their myriad forms.

When I say right, I am using the typical definition, supportive of Capitalism. Social Democrats, Liberals, American Libertarians, fascists, and all their myriad forms.

Considering Lemmy is an international site, it doesn't make sense to use the Overton Window. If we went by, say, the American Overton Window, but another user lived in, say, Spain, there's a significant difference there. That's why I am using the standard definitions, and not going off of any one country's Overton Window.

JubilantJaguar

When I say right, I am using the typical definition, supportive of Capitalism. Social Democrats, Liberals, American Libertarians, fascists, and all their myriad forms.

For two of the words this is not a typical definition. Social democrats do not code as "right" anywhere in the world. And liberals are only "right" when viewed through a partisan US-progressive lens, or else perhaps in southern Europe (where the word is mostly an economic term). Elsewhere they would be closer to left or center. This whole discussion illustrates the limited usefulness of the left-right axis at describing ideas.

ArcaneSlime , edited

Hang on now. Fascists are historically the "third position" (which is why both the left and the right got together in about 1939 to stomp their collective shit in.) They're neither "right" nor "left."

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Third_Position

OpenStars

Cowbee is notorious for not actually answering questions, just throwing up the same articles to read and asking people to DM them to continue the conversation. Make what you will of that info - are deeds done in the light of logical discourse inherently "better" than those done in darkness, i.e. are facts that can stand up to scrutiny somehow more "correct" than those that can only be whispered in the dark to those most vulnerable individuals still living in the cave?

Cowbee [he/him] , edited

You'll note that I *did* end up continuing the conversation publicly in this thread. I have only *once* actually taken a conversation into DMs, with Blaze, whom they can probably back me up on. When I say "feel free to DM if you have any questions" regarding theory I have linked, it's because I don't expect anyone to immediately buzz off and read a book or article and then get right back, it's an open offer to continue the conversation at any point in time.

Can you elaborate on what you mean by not actually answering questions? In this thread you can see it''s the exact opposite, I am curious what you mean by that.

Finally, when I make my arguments and leave links for supplemental reading, it isn't a requirement to continue conversation. It's supplemental, in case they have doubts or wish to learn more beyond a simple Lemmy thread. If it's necessary reading, I usually quote a relevant paragraph and link the main work.

Diva (she/her) , edited

Being full of anticommunists who call anyone left of Biden a tankie makes an instance right wing in my eyes at least

Shiggles

They… don’t though? Unless you’re pretending saying “voting for [not the democratic candidate] is a vote for Trump” is now apparently right wing and not just a basic understanding of how first past the post works.

Like, your definition is both wrong in terms of what right wing means, *and* not even descriptive of either. They’re just not tankie shitholes so I guess that makes them look bad to you?

Diva (she/her)

So accusing left wingers of being right wing is okay as far as you're concerned if it's about an election

Pointing out that from a left wing perspective, Biden and the Democrats are doing bad things and their supporters are right wing: wrong, not descriptive, belongs in a tankie shit hole.

K

gravitas_deficiency , edited

That’s… not an accurate characterization.

I would have voted for Sanders in a heartbeat. And a lot of other (Americans) on my instance would too. The disdain is more targeted and nuanced than that. A whole lot of us on sh.it just.works have a reasonably solid understanding of the difference between communism and authoritarian communism, and are also often geopolitical nerds to one degree or another. This often leads to us doing our best to combat what we see as bullshit disinformation and misrepresentation when and where we see it.

The vitriol we have towards tankies is specifically a result of:

  • our dislike of the glorification of historical authoritarian leaders (Stalin; Mao)
  • the intentional blurring of the line between communism (which, bluntly, many of us don’t actually have a problem with) and *authoritarian* communism
  • the jingoistic support of modern authoritarian states that either call themselves “communist” despite not really being anything of the sort (China), or who have a historical lineage that runs through an (again, authoritarian) communist state (Russia)

When looked at that way, it’s a lot closer to modern Iron Front ideology (anti-monarchy; anti-fascist; anti-*authoritarian* communist).

OpenStars

That's... what? What?! WHAT!?

img

To anyone else reading, note the @lemmy.ml after their name. There are only so many times people of intelligence can hear the most batshit insane things on Lemmy without either willfully losing IQ points or else blocking the lemmy.ml instance.

Unfortunately, that does next to nothing, bc you'll still see every single batshit insane comment like the above. Every. Single. One. And while it might be a bug, you can sometimes get replies from them too (while other times blissfully not).

Maybe I'll make an account on Lemmy.cafe, which is the only instance I've ever heard of that has actually defederated from lemmy.ml. Though I'm holding out more hope for Sublinks, Piefed, and Mbin too to help address such issues.

Stay safe folks - election season is coming and there are some who want to fuck you up if at all possible (not necessarily the above comment, just in general), don't let it happen!

wizardbeard

So... blocking an instance as a user just hides the instances communities, if I'm remembering the implementation details right. It doesn't block interaction with the instances users. Stupidly misleading.

You'll still need to block the users one by one.

OpenStars

Sadly, I had quite the list going, but upon blocking the instance, decided to clean up all the individual ones from that instance. Oops. Surely a "block" would imply some sort of... I dunno, "blocking" action, one might expect?

Also, at least on 0.19.3, I would not receive notifications from people on those instances. But now on 0.19.5, I do. So... there's that fun little tidbit of knowledge: what little blocking there used to be, has become less so over time.

Oh well, at least this way I get to read the most batshit insane replies to things and laugh at them. Once someone is *aware*, it's not really shocking, compared to a new user who would have no clue - e.g. they could be conversing with an actual PhD scientist on mander.xyz one moment and then somehow jump all the way to "no awkshually you should drink bleach, and follow up by drinking sunshine, bc (this one time at band camp?) I heard that kills the Rona". Which sounds enormously exaggerated I know, but just remember: there are people out there eating raw meat and drinking unpasteurized milk without a care in the world, even in the face of the avian flu situation that seems to have made its way into just about every animal on earth including extremely remote polar bears and such.

Disinformation, unlike misinformation that is more often simply a mistake, is often designed to be outright deadly, to the unprepared (though less for the sake of the actual deaths, and more for how they would then catapult the issue into the media to receive feed-forward attention).

Diva (she/her)

If you're planning on leaving I won't miss you passive aggressively using only neutral pronouns for me or calling me insane.

Samuel Block [OP]

Deleted by author

Diva (she/her)

I wouldn’t want anyone going down an extremist pipeline on either side of the political spectrum.

This isn't a binary thing, there's plenty of centrist extremists and echo chambers for them

pewgar_seemsimandroid

centrism isn't extremism

Diva (she/her)

You can totally have centrist extremists

Cowbee [he/him]

Are you using "extremism" to mean "far from the status quo," or "has absolute belief and violent justification for said belief?" Centrists can absolutely be the latter.

pewgar_seemsimandroid

i think more the first

Cowbee [he/him]

You can aleady block instances if you personally wish, is my point. Everyone knows about Lemmy.ml having Marxists. My point is that rather than trying to *move* communities and keep them consolidated, embrace the differences between instances and be okay with Lemmy.world and Lemmy.ml both having Linux communities, as an example.

I don't share your fear of Marxism and Marxists, which is why I tend to avoid Lemmy.world communities.

curbstickle

You can block the instance, which blocks those communities, but that doesn't block those users on them to be fair. That has to be done individually.

Personally I am comfortable ignoring individuals (and not painting everyone on an instance with the same brush) and would prefer metas/groups/whatever you'd like to refer to them as for my subscriptions, so I'm definitely not the target user of this post.

But just being clear, a user blocking an instance doesn't block the users from that instance, so if that's their goal, no, that's not enough.

Cowbee [he/him]

Defederation has it's own uses, yes, but that also ironically makes it more difficult to avoid trolls. When you defederate from an instance for X reason, only the more irrational users are going to create alts to attack. Defederation is often over-used.

curbstickle

Not advocating for defederation, I'm just pointing out that blocking an instance isn't going to achieve their goal.

Obviously defederation is too large scale. Ideally, there would be an option for people to block users from the instance when blocking an instance, or something like that.

This would avoid the exact scenario you mention because it would come down to the user level, so that troll would have to put in quite a bit more effort to get around that. Unfortunately, that's not currently an option, along with some other features I'd love to see on Lemmy.

Again, I'm just pointing out that blocking an instance does not achieve their goal.

givesomefucks

but that doesn’t block those users on them to be fair. That has to be done individually.

It blocks notifications of replies.

Sometimes I'll notice a .ml responded to me, and if they seem decent I'll reply back. But I'll never get a notification and that's almost always as far as it goes.

Which is fine. Lots of people can make one civil comment to rope someone in a conversation.

OpenStars

You will lose that ability as soon as Lemmy.world upgrades past 0.19.3. My instance likewise had 0.19.3 until like a week ago, and ever since it "upgraded" to 0.19.5, I get notifications now from users from blocked instances. The developers of Lemmy seem adamant that people are not allowed to ban whole entire instances, which I find... ironic for... reasons:-).

pewgar_seemsimandroid

different people have different needs, for example an estonian instance would have a larger need to defederate with .ml than .world would, because of the years of soviet occupation.

Cowbee [he/him]

Sure, my point is about community replication. Defederation has its own uses, my point is that *community consolidation* serves very few people.

givesomefucks

just advising new users to watch where they are active; I

Your profile has 10 posts/comments and has been around for a week....

Are you the original OP who just keeps making new accounts to spam this?

Or do you think 10 posts/comments over a week means you understand Lemmy and should reach out to teach "new users"?

goferking0

You reply to wrong comment? Cowbee has a 10month account

givesomefucks , edited

Nah, I replied to OP and they deleted the comment.

Maybe that looks weird on some federated instances or apps tho.

If it looks like I'm replying to someone else, that would explain the down votes.

OPs post gets reposted pretty frequently, always by new accounts which tend to disappear a day or two later after some lazy posts.

I really do think it's the same person who's bans are in the screenshots.

It's too random that a bunch of brand new accounts all find the post and quote it with perfectly formatting including all the pictures just to repost it the same place they found it.

Especially since the new account always claims they're "helping new users" like they've been here forever.

goferking0

Yeah it feels like it's just posted once a week

merthyr1831

Every influx of users and the usual suspects who are DESPERATE to have Lemmy turn into Reddit start pissing and shitting themselves that maybe their American liberal opinions arent dominant anymore.

This shit is pathetic.

🇰 🌀 🇱 🇦 🇳 🇦 🇰 ℹ️ , edited

Yeah, no... We just don't like people who straight up deny history that actually happened nor do we like fascist fuck heads. Seen enough bullshit from your instance to know it's full of Nazi dumbshits acting like they're actually leftists. Not to even mention the mountain of hypocrisy shown by the admins and moderators.

ContrarianTrail

Hope you at least see the irony in being able to come here to criticize our 'American liberal opinions' in a thread about the systematic censorship of people criticizing yours.

OpenStars

It is hilarious to see that on every single "we should defed from the tankies" post, the tankies always show up to demonstrate for us all first-hand *precisely why* we should defederate from the tankies. Not b/c of their political views, but b/c of the abusive toxicity.

lemmydividebyzero

How can it be dominant on ml instances, if it's removed after 10 seconds by scared ml mods that can't handle different views on anything?

SupraMario , edited

You mean that people are annoyed that tankies like you, want to turn this into an echo chamber that's just like the right wing republicans...and that bothers you?

Edit: checking your history... yes you're a solid tankie idiot.

Diva (she/her) , edited

I agree with you that this conflict needs a resolution, it's possible lemmy.ml has done some things wrong, that's why I support a two state solution that guarantees lemmy.mls security.

TexMexBazooka

This made me cackle, have an upvote

pewgar_seemsimandroid

i created !de_ml@lemmy.blahaj.zone to help people leave lemmy.ml

FundMECFSResearch

cheers

givesomefucks , edited

On the other hand, I've blocked both those instances months ago and it's been great.

Strangely I did notice I got banned from a blahaj community like a week ago despite not commenting there for at least 6 months, maybe ever?

Which is kind of the whole point of me blocking them

Both have mods/admins that are very very opinionated about things. And they tend to refuse to let things go (much like OP or you making that sub)

So if they see something they dont agree with, they'll pre-emptively ban an account, because, and this is doubly important right here:

It's trolls feeding trolls drama in a big loop

You making that sub, OP making this post...

All you're doing is encouraging them

Can you really not understand?

I'll try and remember to come back and check if you respond, but I don't get notifications from instances I've blocked.

Edit:

I was banned five days ago apparently for this comment from a year ago:

https://lemmy.blahaj.zone/comment/3159844

Definitely not because I blocked that mod five days ago and they desperately found a way to "get back".

Great example of my point tho, silly instances like that there's no point in fighting them, just block their instance and go about your life.

Draconic NEO

You were banned in blahaj.zone for your comment on Chess:

They take the whole trans women allowed/not-allowed in sports thing very serious there, and I agree with them mostly. The sports thing is a dog-whistle transphobes use because it sounds reasonable even though it really isn't. It is especially unreasonable in a game like Chess (which your agreement to could be seen as agreement with trans-segrigation in sports). It's likely they reacted way too harshly, outright permanent instance bans over something small like that are very extreme, a warning would've probably been the best thing to do, maybe a temp ban at most.

givesomefucks , edited

Weird, maybe because I looked at world's modlog and not theirs like you seem to have done.

I clicked on the link, it was a comment from literally a year ago lol.

https://lemmy.blahaj.zone/comment/3159844

I blocked the mod of that sub about a week ago, so they likely went and saw my last comment there and banned me for it.

Like I said tho, I'm perfectly fine with it. I blocked their whole instance a long time ago, I think it might have actually been that thread that clued me in it wasn't worth ever going there again.

Thanks for finding that tho! I'll remember to check an instance's own modlog in the future for more details.

Quick edit:

(which your agreement to could be seen as agreement with trans-segrigation in sports).

Nah, I was explaining how the only way to get better at chess is to play better people, and there's no reason for any classes based around gender. And the explanation for difference in skill, is simply that the best men refused to play women, so they never improved. The first female grand master was only that good because her dad was crazy good and made her and her sister play him constantly.

You need the experience of high level play to be able to play at a high level, and any gender divide in division just prolongs that. So I was arguing against any segregation at all.

That's why they let it stay up a year until I blocked the mod of that community.

And suddenly it was transphobic.

Draconic NEO

Yeah I saw it on their modlog. It's very useful to check the modlogs of remote servers, especially since admin comments removals and site-bans for remote users don't federate in the modlog.


(which your agreement to could be seen as agreement with trans-segrigation in sports).

Nah, I was explaining how the only way to get better at chess is to play better people, and there's no reason for any classes based around gender. And the explanation for difference in skill, is simply that the best men refused to play women, so they never improved. The first female grand master was only that good because her dad was crazy good and made her and her sister play him constantly.

You need the experience of high level play to be able to play at a high level, and any gender divide in division just prolongs that. So I was arguing against any segregation at all.

I guess it was likely a miscommunication or misunderstanding. They probably thought you meant something different than what you actually meant.

givesomefucks , edited

They probably thought you meant something different than what you actually meant.

...

You think they do an annual review of threads?

It was over a year ago I made the comment, they banned me for it five days ago.

I don't know man, it's weird you're not getting that, but it doesn't really matter.

I'm sorry if I'm explaining it poorly.

I did remember it wasn't I blocked a mod, I explained why I might not respond. And apparently they didn't like that I had blocked their instance

JubilantJaguar

The solution is that an instance that cheerfully associates itself with an ideology that wiped away the lives of many tens of millions of people and immiserated possibly a billion more - that instance should be relegated to a dusty basement room where new users won't easily find it.

EleventhHour

To be fair, those deaths can be blamed on the brutality of the likes of Stalin and Mao. Communism didn’t kill those people— but its authoritarian nature certainly provided fertile ground to be abused by monsters.

Like most things political, it’s highly nuanced and complex. I don’t particularly like to defend communism, but an ideology alone can’t do anything. It requires bad actors who use that ideology for their own ends.

Handles

I think that, more to the point, no matter the culpability of communism in Soviet politics, tankies seem more enamoured with the latter — the militant, strongarm regimes — than the actual ideals and principles of ideology.

Eldritch

A few things. Communism isn't Marxist leninism. Communism isn't authoritarian. And it's not just Stalin and Mao. It's literally everywhere Marxist leninism has ever been attempted. Communism is a classless stateless society. Therefore a Marxist leninist government will never become communist. Because they are defined by their class separation of those with political power and those without, and the strong overbearing presence of the state.

There's nothing objectionable to Communism whatsoever. And no one should have any qualms about defending it ever. What we should question is why one group of authoritarians the Marxist leninist desire to be so closely tied to it. And another group of authoritarians the capitalists demand everyone be afraid of it.

JubilantJaguar

Many would say that this is disingenuous reasoning. The fact is that the brutality was committed in the name of the ideology, and that whenever the ideology has been tried out, it always - *always* - ends the same way. For exactly the reason you suggest: any ideology that precludes dissent is ripe for abuse.

Stovetop

I don't think any ideology has not had brutality committed in its name.

JubilantJaguar

Disingenuous or ignorant. By definition a Quaker or a Jain cannot commit brutality in the name of their beliefs. Conversely, an ideology which puts the collective before the individual, such as fascism or communism, is, a straightforward recipe for brutality.

Stovetop , edited

Quakers are just an extension of Christian ideology. Jainism I don't know enough about, but any religious identity will eventually develop the concept of justified violence when faced with the existential threat of a larger opposing religion.

Samuel Block [OP] , edited

For me, it’s not the fact that the instance exists that’s troublesome. The bigots can have their space if they want; that’s the point of the fediverse. My issue is the fact that it’s so popular and potentially luring new users into a pipeline. It’s truly a shame how big it’s gotten…

JubilantJaguar , edited

Yes, sure. As a liberal, I'm pretty suspicious of even speech-policing, let alone bans or (here) defederation. But I just wish more people understood that the ideas these people claim to support are not anodyne. They're not just sticking it to The Man, they're not democrats or even Swedish-style socialists. They're defending the indefensible. *Addendum:* To be clear, I think even many of *them* don't understand this properly.

umbrella , edited

you mean the us-led neoliberal ideology?

if so, agreed

OBJECTION!

immiserated possibly a billion more

Hmm, this graph must be upside-down or something, weird.

IndustryStandard , edited

Brand new account making smear post against lemmy.ml as if they are veterans.

Totally not sus.

FundMECFSResearch

It’s obviously an alt. And I want to say I understand OP’s decision to use an alt. I’ve had some creepy stalking and people downvote large parts of my entire post history for criticism of ML.

IndustryStandard

They need an alt to go around Lemmy badmouthing another instance?

The user states they have a political agenda as well.

FundMECFSResearch

Well I don’t know how you like it when a user gets mad at you for something you share and goes back months in your post history until they found something personal you said and then starts insulting you based on that. But I’d prefer to avoid the situation.

And “bad mouth” is very subjective here. They are shaeing an older post which is basically a transcript of the modlog.

barsquid

That user didn't make the post they're linking to.

AchtungDrempels

That user still made this post right here, and also they made up the fact that Lemmy is gaining in popularity.

merthyr1831

"turn this place into an echo chamber" motherfucker Lemmy world has 10 times the users, and the only "echo chamber" shit I see is insistent Kamala Harris cope and seethe whenever someone mentions Israel or Palestine.

Meanwhile Lemmy . world mods change the TOS to spite individual communities, ban discussion of piracy despite it being perfectly legal and present on a different instance! Grow up.

sunzu2

Regime doesn't like it, so they won't allow it ;)

electric_nan

If all you want to see are opinions and memes that fit within the political confines of the New York Times, then .ml probably isn't for you. Lemmy.world has taken a very brave (and rare!) stance of being a champion of neoliberal politics. The mods and users here will do everything they can to make sure you aren't exposed to any political philosophy to the left of Henry Kissinger.

khannie

There are about two people on here who wouldn't say "fuck Henry Kissinger".

What a massive load of shite. The fucking smell of boot polish off your breath is disgusting.

Jog on.

electric_nan

Hillary Clinton considered him a "great friend and mentor" so I guess I could have said her. I'm also fully aware of the liberal tendency to place a higher importance on image than on policy.

sunzu2

Lemmy.world is just the regime front on the fediverse.

News, politics subs, political memes are just place to talk about things the regime likes peasants to discuss. Trying saying vote for third party on there and watch that ban hammer lol

Regime whores for ya.

beleza pura

the software was created by marxist-leninists. maybe deal with it?

fuckingkangaroos

Yes good point, I suggest we deal with it by defederating hexbear and the .ml instances.

beleza pura

good luck outpacing the flagship instance

FundMECFSResearch , edited

Outpacing? The “flagship” instance has a less than 5% the traffic of world, which doesn’t ban someone for mentioning Tianmen square or the Uyghur Genocide.

fuckingkangaroos

Thanks! It's already happening.

queermunist she/her

I just don't understand why people like OP even left Reddit.

PugJesus

Hey, remember when you said you'd vote for the Dem candidate if Biden was replaced? How's that going?

basmati

As with most time sure they meant, if Biden stepped down and a primary was run, not if he unilaterally appointed one of the least popular presidential candidates of all time.

PugJesus

Oh yes, just like I'm sure she was being completely sincere when she said all Biden had to do to earn her vote was 'call for a ceasefire' within the coming year.

Turns out when MLs don't say a single thing in good faith, people start remembering and stop taking them seriously. :)

basmati

Given Harris has never and has stated she will never call for a permanent ceasefire, I have no idea where you think your gotcha moment is here.

PugJesus

Given Harris has never and has stated she will never call for a permanent ceasefire, I have no idea where you think your gotcha moment is here.

Do you people even try, or is honesty against the terms of your religion or something?

monobot

While I understand someone not agreeing with the way some instance or community is managed, I see value in different opinions.

Lemmy is great for exactly this purpose, we can have different instances and are able to be exposed to different ideas.

I can not understand the need of some people to limit their exposure to different ideas.

Cowbee [he/him]

It's why I try to get more people to read theory, the people leaving Reddit usually are the types who care enough to keep up with current events and willful enough to abandon Reddit over ideals, but generally haven't yet read leftist theory.

To be clear, many people *do* read theory, they just aren't the same people trying to recreate Reddit.

P4ulin_Kbana

Man, I just wished I couldn't have to worry about political ideologies and extremism, it surely feels like Twitter, except the extremism comes from the left. The worst thing is that Lemmy's developers support these stuff…

peopleproblems

I knew it was bloody and thousands had been slaughtered, but I'm so surprised they fought back. I never learned they actually had the chance to. So many survivors and observers too. That's reassuring.

It means that the Chinese know their government is not omnipotent. That's why all legal communication is unencrypted and monitored. If citizens were allowed to communicate as they do in the West, they'd be able to organize and overthrow the CCP.

That's what they are afraid of. The people aren't afraid of the mechanized power the PLA has, and as demonstrated in 1989, the power is in numbers. If the CCP doesn't wipe out all memory of Tiannemen Square, they are doomed. But the CCP can't. Unless they cut China off from the rest of the world entirely, the knowledge will remain. The CCP can only get stricter and harsher, speeding up the time for a pressure cooker to explode. They know this. The people know this.

At some point in the future, they will go too far, and the people will end it.

OpenStars

Just like the USA's experiment with far-right ideology, and also just like the COVID pandemic - knowledge that it will eventually implode seems not to matter one bit.

manuallybreathing

Anti-communism is the root of fascism

Podunk

So nuanced. So brave.

DragonTypeWyvern , edited

I'd say it's the love of social heirarchy but tomato tomatoes, as the red scare nonsense in this thread proves.

You've got morons babbling about .ml users being "security threats to the fediverse" LMAO, shitlibs will never change, and I say that as someone that got instance banned from .ml for saying federal representative democracies are, by definition, a form of democracy.

PiousAgnostic

You are the fascist problem of communism.

SoJB

ITT: genocide supporting fascists get triggered by being called genocide supporting fascists

We get it, you’re jealous about how leftists are always on the correct side of history.

blackn1ght

This is like the perfect comment as to why a lot of people find ml users insufferable and toxic.

barsquid

Most of their comments are perfect examples. Everyone except them is a fascist liberal who loves genocide.

Even Uncommitted, who have basically the same opinion as everyone that Harris is in the wrong but Donald would be worse. Fascist genocide lovers.

OpenStars

b-b-bUt SuReLy rUsSiA hAs NeVeR dOnE a GeNoCidE?!

Or ChInA eItHeR?!

The USA supporting Israel is... ahem, never mind, anyway it's not anywhere on the same class as Russia CURRENTLY and ACTIVELY being the very ones DOING the genocide.

*Nobody* is that dumb. Therefore that's beyond ignorance - that's sheer, willful obstinacy.

zbyte64

The funny thing is I thought you were talking about all the genocides, including those led by Russia, but then I saw your handle and realized you mean only those done by NATO and their allies.

CaptainBasculin

cringe take

electric_nan

🙄

lemmydividebyzero

Had a special experience, too.

I got blocked for arguing. Other people who he posted burning Israel flags or wanted the total destruction of Israel had nothing to fear...

sunzu2

World smallest violin is playing Lol

Fuck Israel, it is an abomination.

lemmydividebyzero , edited

Black and white, you know... Maybe, there is a grey way between loving a country and its total destruction...

The "innovative" idea to destroy that country is probably 100 years old, has never been successful and is always a very good attempt to get as many people as possible killed over there... Maybe, if something fails every time over 100 years, it's time to try out something new. 😐

DarkThoughts

Even outside of the Tankie instances the Fediverse is filled to the brim with literal terrorist simps, both within the general user base as well as the various community mods. You literally get comments removed or even banned for having nuanced middle ground positions that aren't propaganda for one side.